Home


Aime and Scope


Abstracting and indexing


Editorial Board


Ethics in publishing


Submission and Autor Guidlines


On-line first


Latest Issue


Archive


Reviewing methods


Contact





















© GEOSPORT FOR SOCIETY,

Scientific Journal founded in 2014 under aegis of University of Oradea (Romania), University of Debrecen (Hungary) and University of Gdánsk (Poland).


Edited by Oradea University Press

ISSN 2393-1353

 

Journal homepage: http://geosport.uoradea.ro/geosport.html

e-mail contact: geosport@uoradea.ro





Each paper will be sent to at least two independent reviewers. If there are inconsistencies between the reviewers, a third reviewer will be asked to review the manuscript. Since the review process is a time and energy consuming work, the editors will acknowledge their effort by respecting their proposals entirely.
















Reviewing Methods






Reviewing steps

Step A. All of the manuscript will get registration number and the editors will send to author(s) the registration mail.

Step B. Each article is reviewed by the editorial team, checked whether the editing requirements were followed and if it is related to the topic of the review. Moreover, a paper may be rejected without external review if the editors think that it is unacceptable for publication (see the guidelines page).

Step C. Each paper will be reviewed by 2-3 independent reviewers. Each paper will be sent to at least two independent reviewers. Since the review process is a time and energy consuming work, the editors will acknowledge their effort by respecting their proposals entirely. If there are inconsistencies between the reviewers, a third reviewer will be asked to review the manuscript.


*  *  *

For the evaluation of an article (Step C), reviewers will take into account: importance of debated issues, adequacy of literature review, rigor of methodology used, rigor of analysis (appropriate interpretation), clarity of writing, explanations, and concepts, suitability of illustrations and tables (too many, too few, clarity), adequacy of abstract (accurate summary of entire paper) and keywords, adequacy of introduction (purpose and rationale), adequacy of conclusions, accuracy of the title and contribution to the study of journal fields.

*  *  *


The editor will decide the acceptance or rejection of the manuscripts according to these reviews.


*  *  *

  If article is accepted the comments of reviewers will be sent to the author by the editorial board to make the necessary changes.

Then, the checked article is sent back to the reviewers.


Step D. Formally accepted manuscripts will be send to English language editors to verify the spelling. Only spelling checked (final acceptance date) manuscripts are proofed.


*  *  *

Proof will be sent to the first (or corresponding) author only once and it should be returned without delay. Corrections should be limited to typographical errors. The proof corrections must be suggested using the review option (text editing, check box, etc.) in a *pdf file editor software (like Adobe Acrobat or Cute PDF Prof.). We doesn't accept the corrections by resending the original *doc file.

Following publication, the first (or corresponding) author will be provided a free *pdf copy of the article.



View full Editorial Board
















mentenance and design:

HERMAN Grigore Vasile: grigoreherman@yahoo.com



Flag Counter

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.